Lid on the front is different depending on the application that is used in the performance if asked to draw a front that I do not have to explain it to me on the cover. Stir well to fabric friction. The front-door access to the crank through the water. The front washed clean. Use less water than the front. Cap on water use over Power consumption is less than the front door on more power. The front cover on a lot less detergent than washing powder. The front. Noise than Less vibration due to the horizontal. The lid on the light.The top lid will trap dirt in the machine when used infrequently. Than the front. However, they remove the lid on the tank to wash out more easily than the front. Front fabric has a lot of capacity. (In the same size), and no clothes but it does not rotate. If it will not be closed due to water than the front. Machine is loaded with the weight of the water. The front last for long. I've since married and universities are not alone. Will see that the front better than the lid on almost all sides. The only exception ... The front. Expensive than the lid on about 3 times (the same size) heavier than the transportation difficulties. Maintenance more difficult. If it is difficult parts to repair it. It was a rolling machine that will not invest the same front. (Fear of loss or uncle in the capital, but most are set up front to draw) because it's expensive to do. Also on the front door, it drops to 20 times faster than a lot of payback. Investment in the top lid was not on the stand because a few years, it is not the same (our attention), they sell it as a spare and then buy a new machine Ki๊kๆ was replaced by a need to gain the added grip. The fabric was. Here, though he calls it a little difficult, but it is very easy to lose a lot less waste waste waste waste is difficult to replace. It looks like to me. But no better than the absolute amount of the chain length and amount of City Polytechnic of young electricians G17